The High Court has ruled today that the Welsh Government’s controversial plans to force LGBTQ+ teaching on all children from the age of 3 upwards is lawful and does not conflict with parental rights.
In a lengthy and comprehensive judgment handed down this afternoon (Thursday 22nd December 2022)
Mrs Justice Steyn rejected the judicial review by concerned parents against the Welsh Governments ’radical power grab which will force all children in Wales from the age of 3 to be subjected to the new Relationships and Sexuality Education curriculum, which includes compulsory and explicit sexuality
and LGBTQ+ teaching.
For the first time the parental right to withdraw their children from explicit sex
education classes had been removed from the law. The controversial proposals, which were opposed by 90% of parents in the Welsh Government’s consultation, is to be subject to a “whole school approach” whereby themes of sexuality and LGBTQ+ are to permeate the whole curriculum.
The concerned parents argued that this new curriculum exposes their children to serious dangers, and that the common law protected parental rights to opt their children out of classes which they considered entirely inappropriate and conflicted with their religious and philosophical beliefs. This is the first time
the courts have had to rule directly on this important question, but Mrs Justice Steyn held that:
“the case law and texts relied upon by the claimants do not support the existence of a fundamental common law right of excusal. I reject the contention that such a right exists.”
Read the Full Press Release
Donate to the campaign Here
3 Comments
Ep.280 | In Wales 3 Year Olds, Will Be Taught Sex & Gender Ideology In The Classroom - For The Love of Truth
December 26, 2022, 9:09 pm[…] The webpage I was reading from:https://libertytactics.co.uk/high-court-judge-rules-4-year-can-be-taught-sex-gender-ideology-in-the-… […]
REPLYPhilip Ridley
December 27, 2022, 8:35 amThey focussed on the wrong thing. The issue is whether the school is a Guardian. If not, there is no Royal Prerogative of Parens Patrea, which only exists when there is no adult with parental responsibility. The Crown can only lawfully appoint a Guardian and exercise parental responsibility in that circumstance, see s.5 Children Act which is consistent with the customary prerogative.
REPLYPhilip Ridley@Philip Ridley
December 27, 2022, 8:42 amExcusal only applies when there is a duty. There is only a duty if the State is Guardian. It is not. The question here should be whether the State has Excusal, because the State has a duty to consider the wishes of the adults with parental responsibility (the Parents). They do not.
REPLYThis is the problem with the common law, most do not understand it.